|
| ||||
| Caught in the middle…not a comfortable position, but not an unusual position for a general manager of a private club. It's sort of like the kid's game "pig in the middle," you don't get out of the middle until you catch the ball, or knock it down. | ||||
| The general manager or chief operating officer is that person in the middle as the buffer…the influencer…the point person between the members and the board of directors in the private club. At the same time, the GM has to work with a volunteer board of directors to achieve the goals and objectives of the board and the membership…a relationship that's vital to a club's continued success. | ||||
| As a GM you don't get out of the middle until you "catch the ball." | ||||
| There are many factors influencing the relationship between a board and the GM, not the least of which is the board's daily intrusion into the management of the club's operations. It's a situation of where a board is not satisfied with establishing policy and giving the GM the tools to do the job, but where the board, or members of the board inject themselves into micro-managing the daily operations. All of which causes distress for boards, management and members. Why does it happen? | ||||
| There's a need to articulate policies, roles and responsibilities but these must flow from a beneficial relationship between the GM and the board of directors. So the question is: How can the board improve its relationship with the general manager to make it more productive? | ||||
| It's a matter of trust, says Richard Kopplin, president of Kopplin Search Inc., based in Scottsdale, AZ. There may be a high turnover of many private club positions, but at the same time there are "some general managers who have served five to 10 years in every positions they've held," he said. | ||||
| "I believe the secret to any long tenure is the general manager's ability to build trust with the board of directors." And to make that trust relationship happen there are a number of strategies to develop. | ||||
| Norm Spitzig, a principal with Palm Beach Gardens, Fla.-based Master Club Advisors, a private club executive search firm, suggests the key to improving the relationship lies in the board "better understanding the full scope of today's general manager's authorities and responsibilities." Reaching this understanding begins with board members completing an orientation that more fully clarifies their roles. "Interestingly enough," says Spitzig, "any reluctance on the club's part to take this step comes, more often than not, from the general manager rather than members of the board. | ||||
| "Board members, for the most part, really want to improve their relationship with the GM and are willing to do what it takes to achieve this important goal." | ||||
| Communication, he stresses, is another factor. "A board can significantly improve its relationship by providing regular, honest feedback on the GM's performance. An open, candid evaluation process including a forthright discussion of areas needing improvement, will prove a valuable tool for both improved performance and increased loyalty to the club," Spitzig related. And this he feels has to dovetail with a clear definition of roles and responsibilities. "This effort on the front end will help minimize misunderstandings and confusion, and in so doing, produce more productive and satisfied management." | ||||
| That role clarification is essential is emphasized by Tarun Kapoor, CEO of Kapoor and Kapoor, a hospitality consulting firm based in San Marino, CA. It's a triple layer of clarification and accountability. | ||||
| "The general manager, the executive committee and the board each must know what they're responsible for, have the authority to do what is necessary, and know what they will be accountable for." The lack of role clarification is where there is often confusion within the private club structure. | ||||
| "Roles must be articulated and then enforced," Kapoor said. "Problems invariably come up when volunteers feel they have the right to execute decisions affecting the club's resources, yet they may not have the authority to make the decision." | ||||
| What does Kapoor suggest? "I'd recommend the role of the board and/or volunteers, be one of setting the strategic direction, establishing club operating guidelines then ensuring management and/or volunteers are operating within the guidelines, and supervising, auditing and managing the GM or COO." | ||||
However, for all this to happen it goes back to the point emphasized by Kopplin…TRUST, and there are eight strategies he feels are vitally important in developing a high level trust relationship between the board and the GM.
A better, more productive relationship, Kopplin suggests, revolves around these strategies:
Publisher's final thoughts | For sure, opinions vary, but boards need to fully understand what a general manager's roles and responsibilities
are in the private club industry today. These roles must be clarified so the GM, the executive management and the volunteer
board of directors each are fully aware of their responsibility and authority. And ultimately, there must be a firm trust
relationship, as Richard Kopplin suggests. When this happens, general managers flourish, boards flourish, the club's culture
flourishes and that means continued success for the private club. At least, that's the way I see it! | What's your opinion. If you wish to respond to the Publisher's Perspective, or other BoardRoom articles, contact
Publisher John G. Fornaro by email at johnf@apcd.com. | John Fornaro |
Publisher |